Festus Begins Talks on Community Agreement for Proposed Data Center
Consultant outlines incentive tools and urges leaders to define priorities before negotiations are finalized.
A consultant hired to guide Festus through negotiations over a proposed data center told city leaders this week that the most important step right now is simple: decide what the community wants before any agreement is finalized.
The discussion took place during a stakeholder roundtable with city officials and representatives of local taxing jurisdictions. City leaders said the meeting was structured as a working session between negotiators and stakeholders and did not include public input.
Economic development consultant Steve Etcher of MarksNelson Advisors presented an overview of Missouri incentive tools commonly used in large-scale projects, including data centers, and urged the group to think beyond a “wish list” of city projects.
“I would challenge you to think of it this way,” Etcher said during the discussion. “Step out of your role as a city leader and say, as a community patron, what do I want for my community?”
A Framework for Incentives
Etcher explained that economic development incentives are commonly used to help communities compete for major projects, increase local investment, and create predictability around tax revenues.
He outlined key terms that frequently appear in incentive agreements:
- PILOT (Payment In Lieu of Taxes): a negotiated payment made when property is placed into public ownership through incentive structures.
- Community Benefit Agreement: a list of specific benefits or commitments made to the broader community.
- Performance Agreement: a contract that ties incentives to job creation, wages, and investment targets.
- Infrastructure Development Agreement: a way to require a developer to fund public infrastructure needed to support the project.
Etcher emphasized that major data center projects generate local tax impacts in four primary categories: real and personal property taxes, utility-related taxes, franchise fees, and sales taxes.
He noted that data centers often carry unusually high levels of taxable personal property because of equipment housed inside the facility. However, that equipment also depreciates quickly, creating a “roller coaster” effect in personal property tax collections unless the equipment is regularly refreshed.
Chapter 68 vs. Chapter 100
Much of the discussion focused on two Missouri incentive frameworks: Chapter 68 and Chapter 100.
Etcher said both can place project assets into public ownership and replace standard taxation with negotiated PILOT payments. The primary difference is who authorizes the incentive.
Chapter 100 programs are typically authorized directly by the city, while Chapter 68 incentives are typically authorized through a state-established port authority.
Etcher said collaboration between cities and port authorities is common and that agreements are fixed once signed.
“These agreements are inked,” Etcher told the group, describing the importance of setting terms early. “Nothing is off the table until we take it off the table.”
What Festus Wants: Workforce, Broadband, Public Safety
As the conversation shifted from definitions to priorities, several ideas rose to the top.
Multiple stakeholders emphasized workforce development, including the potential for a STEM pipeline connecting local high schools and Jefferson College with training aligned to the needs of the data center industry.
Representatives discussed the possibility of curriculum partnerships, equipment donations, and specialized training that would prepare local students for technical jobs that match the industry’s skill demands.
Etcher also highlighted broadband infrastructure as an opportunity.
“A data center project is going to build up robust infrastructure to support the project,” Etcher said, noting that fiber capacity could create opportunities to expand broadband access across the community.
Public safety was another area raised repeatedly, including the cost of future police vehicles, facility upgrades, and fire equipment as the region continues to grow.
One participant suggested setting aside an endowment-style fund to reduce the likelihood of future tax increases for major public safety purchases.
Another suggestion involved improvements that could benefit the broader county, including assistance for residents struggling with failing septic systems in unincorporated areas.
Questions Over Future Tax Policy
Stakeholders also raised concerns about the risk of future state or federal policy changes affecting long-term revenue.
One question centered on potential legislation that could force tax rate rollbacks after large revenue increases. Etcher said contracts generally remain enforceable once signed, though future policy shifts are difficult to predict.
Another question focused on proposals at the federal level that could require data centers to supply their own power, potentially affecting the city’s franchise fee revenue tied to electricity sales. Etcher said he would need to evaluate that scenario further but noted that power contracts often carry long-term commitments that create near-term stability.
Transportation and Road Protections
City leaders also discussed transportation impacts, including traffic increases from both construction and long-term employment growth.
Stakeholders urged the city to require protections for local roads and to prevent heavy truck traffic from using neighborhood back roads.
Etcher suggested that a post-construction road repair agreement and a performance bond could be included to ensure road damage is fixed after construction concludes.
Buffer Zones, Monitoring, and Water Use
Near the end of the discussion, city leaders stated several expectations they want included in negotiations.
- A 1,000-foot buffer zone between the closest homes near Ashford Place and the project area.
- Preserving existing woods on the ridge to serve as a natural barrier.
- Installation of sound, air, and vibration monitoring stations.
- A closed-loop water system designed to reduce large-scale water consumption.
Next Steps
City officials said stakeholders will submit additional ideas to the city attorney for review as negotiations continue.
Etcher told the group that now is the time to define priorities, because once the agreement is structured the terms become difficult to change.
The discussion ended with city leaders thanking members of the public who attended quietly and respectfully, even though no public comment was taken during the session.
If you liked this article, you’ll love The Jefferson Review.
Our free community newsletter is delivered every Thursday and Sunday, covering the local government decisions, development updates, and community stories shaping Jefferson County.
Don’t miss what impacts your town next.
Stay informed. Stay local.